Writing Styles for eLearning Narration

Sorry you’ve reach this page. This blog post moved to my new website. You can find it here.

- Tim

 

About these ads
This entry was posted in eLearning Design, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Writing Styles for eLearning Narration

  1. Shailesh G says:

    Thanks Tim. very informative & helpful post. Keep posting like this.

  2. Gale says:

    Tim, thanks so much for this post. I appreciate you sharing your different writing styles and your suggestions. This was a pleasure to read.

  3. Jeff Dalto says:

    This is nice, I’m going to post a link to this article into a related post on my own blog.

    • Tim says:

      Sounds good, thank you Jeff!

      • jeff dalto says:

        My pleasure, Tim.

        My own blog post already has several other links to other folks’ blogs too, pointing to posts on related topics. You may find some stuff there to interest you, or perhaps you’re familiar with them already.

        Cheers,
        Jeff

  4. Jeff Dalto says:

    Here’s my blog post on Writing Instructional Materials, which now has a link to this blog post written by you. You have some nice stuff here, well done.

    http://blog.convergencetraining.com/2013/02/tips-for-writing-instructional-and.html

  5. technkl says:

    I like this line Tim: “It’s a waste of time to create a talking head video that simply lectures to your learners.” Way too much do I see a talking head, or worse yet an animated talking head that just becomes creepy. Always ask “does this add anything for the learner?”

    • Tim says:

      Thank you! And I totally agree with about the animated avatars. Don’t care for those either. There cool to be cool, but really have any true use.

      • Jeff Dalto says:

        I think I have read studies that show including an animated avatar (or a talking human face) increases comprehension and retention because our brains are “hardwired” to pay attention to human faces. No?

      • Tim says:

        Hi Jeff,

        Although I don’t care for the look and feel of an animated avatar (I think they’re creepy), I do think there is a time and place for a “talking head.”

        I think my issue with it is that I’ve never seen it done well. Like I always say, everything should be done with intention. But too often do I see people use video/animated talking heads because it looks cool, not because it enhances the content.

        I’d be curious to see the data on it…I feel another blog post coming on!

        Thanks for contributing to the conversation Jeff!

      • jeff dalto says:

        I don’t actually use them myself. But I do think there’s some evidence that having a human face (even an animated avatar) helps to focus the attention of the learner, and I think that’s one of the reasons these are used.

        Our brains are designed to automatically look for and pay attention to faces (I’m not sure if it’s human faces or if any face will do–for example, you’d think it’s important to recognize and pay attention to the face of a leopard too).

        In this blog post I wrote recently (http://blog.convergencetraining.com/2013/06/human-information-processing-system.html), if you scroll to the bottom, you’ll see a link to a video by a behavioral psychologist, Dr. Susan Weinschenk, who makes that point while advocating the use of videos that feature humans speaking. Here’s the relevant part of my blog post:

        “Try using online video that includes people (either animated or “real life” people). For a brief explanation why, go to this course from the behavioral psychologist Dr. Susan Weinschenk (who goes by the name of “The Brain Lady”) and watch the free sample of Video 42, “Why Online Video is Compelling.””

        I have read similar things elsewhere, including a study that I read several years ago at a website created by Adobe as part of their support services for Captivate.

      • Tim says:

        Thanks for sharing this! Good info here. I’d love to conduct an experiment with a course and have one with a video and one without, then test the learners on the content and see if there’s a difference. I can definitely see the benefits of having a human face in some instances…just as long as it’s intentional and serves a purpose.

      • technkl says:

        I agree there’s definitely some use cases for a person talking in a lesson, like a subject matter expert telling a story or really cementing an idea. When I see an animated person lecturing to me though, I instantly want to turn it off. When I see a person giving a really captivating lecture who is giving a good performance also though, I think there’s a true place for this along with the slides so we know what the presenter is talking about.

        I guess my thought would be you just have to be careful and not just stick a talking head in there because research says it’s better. Sometimes it’s better, sometime’s it’s not. You just have to ask yourself, “why am I putting this here?”

      • Tim says:

        Great points! In fact, I think with EVERYTHING we write in our narration or design on our slides, we need to ask ourselves, “why am I putting this here?” SO important!

  6. jeff dalto says:

    Oh, sorry, the URL for Dr. Susan Weinschenk’s video didn’t come through:

    https://www.udemy.com/designing-for-engagement/

  7. Pingback: How to write eLearning content | englishinsider

  8. Pingback: Tips for Writing Instructional and Training Material | My great WordPress blog

  9. Pingback: Tips for Writing Instructional and Training Material

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s